认知语言学视角下的现代汉语元语否定研究

　　Chapter 1 Introduction
　　1.1 Background of the Study
　　1.2 Rationale for the Study
　　1.3 Research Objectives
　　1.4 Significance of the Study
　　1.5 Organization of the Book
　　Chapter 2 Literature Review
　　2.1 The Standard Accounts of MN
　　2.1.1 The “Pragmatic Ambiguity” Account
　　2.1.2 The “Semantic Contradiction” Account
　　2.2 The Relevance - theoretical Accounts of MN
　　2.2.1 The “Echoic Use” Account
　　2.2.2 The “Metarepresentation” Account
　　2.3 The “Idiom” Account of MN
　　2.4 The Cognitive Semantic Accounts of MN
　　2.4.1 The Frame - denying Account
　　2.4.2 The ICM - denying Account
　　2.4.3 The Dynamic Categorization Account
　　2.5 Problems with the Existing Accounts
　　2.5.1 Problems with the “Pragmatic Ambiguity” Accounts
　　2.5.2 Problems with the Cognitive Semantic Accounts
　　2.6 Research Gaps and Research Questions
　　2.7 Summary
　　Chapter 3 Theoretical Considerations and Analytical Framework
　　3.1 Verhagen's Model of Intersubjectivity
　　3.1.1 Theoretical Background and Central Claims
　　3.1.2 The Conventional Function of Negative Operator
　　3.2 Langacker's Model of Construal
　　3.2.1 Construal Operations and Alternate Construal
　　3.2.2 The Diversity of Construal Operations
　　3.3 Developing an Integrated Approach to MN
　　3.3.1 Complementarity of the Two Models for MN Analysis
　　3.3.2 The Intersubjective Construal Adjustment Model of MN
　　3.4 Summary
　　Chapter 4 Methodology
　　4.1 A Usage - based Approach to MN
　　4.2 Sources of Data
　　4.3 Data Collection and Identification
　　4.4 Analysis of Corpus Data
　　4.4.1 Frequencies of Various Forms of MN
　　4.4.2 Genre Distribution of MN
　　4.5 Summary
　　Chapter 5 Towards a New Classification of Metalinguistic Negation
　　5.1 Criterion for the Classification and Major Categories of MN
　　5.2 A Detailed Description of Different Types of MN
　　5.2.1 Strengthening Denials
　　5.2.2 Identifying Denials
　　5.2.3 Positioning Denials
　　5.2.4 Formal Denials
　　5.3 Summary
　　Chapter 6 A Cognitive Linguistic Account of Strengthening Denials
　　6.1 Meaning Construction of Scalar Strengthening Denials
　　6.1.1 Scale as Image Schema and Strengthening Operation
　　6.1.2 Adjustment of Scalar Construals and Scalar Strengthening Denials
　　6.2 Meaning Construction of Granular Strengthening Denials
　　6.2.1 Levels of Specificity
　　6.2.2 Intersubjective Adjustment of Specificity and Granular Strengthening Denials
　　6.3 Meaning Construction of Partonomic Strengthening Denials
　　6.3.1 “Part/Whole” Schema and Scope of Attention
　　6.3.2 Intersubjective Adjustment of Attention, Scope and Partonomic Strengthening Denials
　　6.4 Meaning Construction of Epistemic Strengthening Denials
　　6.4.1 Cognitive Model of Epistemic Ground
　　6.4.2 Intersubjective Adjustment of Epistemic Ground and Epistemic Strengthening Denials
　　6.5 Meaning Construction of Directional Strengthening Denials
　　6.5.1 Asymmetrical and Reciprocal Action Chain Schema
　　6.5.2 Intersubjective Adjustment of Direction of Action Chain and Directional Strengthening Denials
　　6.6 Summary
　　Chapter 7 A Cognitive Linguistic Account of Identifying Denials
　　7.1 Meaning Construction of Categorical Identifying Denials
　　7.1.1 The Prototypicality of Category
　　7.1.2 Intersubjective Adjustment of Category Boundaries and Categorical Identifying Denials
　　7.2 Meaning Construction of Facet Identifying Denials
　　7.2.1 Organization of Encyclopedic Knowledge in Domains
　　7.2.2 Intersubjective Adjustment of Domain Activation and Facet Identifying Denials
　　7.3 Meaning Construction of Relational Identifying Denials
　　7.3.1 Trajector/Landmark Alignment
　　7.3.2 Intersubjective Adjustment of Trajector/Landmark Alignment and Relational Identifying Denials
　　7.4 Meaning Construction of Identity Identifying Denials
　　7.4.1 Common Ground as Cognitive Princip

　　龙磊，博士，浙江海洋大学外国语学院副教授、院长助理，国际韩礼德研究会常务理事，浙江省外文学会理事，国际认知语言学研究会会员，中国逻辑学会语用学研究会会员，研究方向为认知语言学和语用学。主持国家社科基金一般项目1项、教育部人文社科基金青年项目1项，作为主要成员参与省部级和厅级项目多项。近年来，在《外国语》《现代外语》等外语类核心期刊和省级刊物上发表论文10余篇。

　　本书采取“基于使用”的研究进路，集中考察元语否定在现代汉语中的真实使用情况，着重从认知语言学的角度对现代汉语元语否定现象进行系统的解释。本书运用认知语言学和语用学理论相结合的方法来研究现代汉语中的元语否定现象，对元语否定现象的总体特征、性质、使用时的制约条件、语用功能、生成的动因和机制进行了详细分析，并用个案和总论性研究进行了论证和解释。